Ticket #3433 (new defect)

Opened 9 years ago

But the compounds themselves may not be expensive, McAllister said.

Reported by: jasileana Owned by: eskil
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: Unknown/Unsure Version: 0.9.827
Severity: Should Have Keywords:
Cc: Fixed in Version:

Description

provides a more blanket approach.??Instead of targeting the tumors itself, he explained, treatments need to do something like disrupt the pathways that cancer cells use to communicate.In the big picture, ??you're seeing a lot more thinking outside the box about trying to treat glioblastoma,?? he said. ??I think in the next 10 to 15 years we're going to start seeing progress forward.??  CogniQ For now, he said, there's no evidence that marijuana is good or bad for glioblastoma tumors.Back in the laboratory, McAllister? said the next step is to test the combination treatment on laboratory animals and then on people. which could be expensive. As for the idea of getting the same effect through a couple of marijuana joints, he had this to say: ??It's unlikely that you could reach effective concentrations by smoking the plant.??  http://www.supplements4help.com/cogniq/

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.