id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	severity	resolution	keywords	cc	fixed_in_version
3433	But the compounds themselves may not be expensive, McAllister said.	jasileana	eskil	provides a more blanket approach.??Instead of targeting the tumors itself, he explained, treatments need to do something like disrupt the pathways that cancer cells use to communicate.In the big picture, ??you're seeing a lot more thinking outside the box about trying to treat glioblastoma,?? he said. ??I think in the next 10 to 15 years we're going to start seeing progress forward.?? [http://www.supplements4help.com/cogniq/ CogniQ] For now, he said, there's no evidence that marijuana is good or bad for glioblastoma tumors.Back in the laboratory, McAllister said the next step is to test the combination treatment on laboratory animals and then on people.  which could be expensive. As for the idea of getting the same effect through a couple of marijuana joints, he had this to say: ??It's unlikely that you could reach effective concentrations by smoking the plant.??  http://www.supplements4help.com/cogniq/	defect	new	major		Unknown/Unsure	0.9.827	Should Have